The Department of Defense, formerly Department of Defense has finally come out publicly and addressed the Directed Energy Weapons question. In a rather surprising tweet on 01/23/26, the Department declared: “Yes, the [Dept of War] has directed energy weapons.
Prior to this declaration, defense department officials have been cagey about this particular topic, probably because a lot of this technology still remains classified.
Targeted individuals have long pressured Congress to look into the use/abuse of such weapons to no avail—again probably due to classification issues.
The dam however broke with the recent military incursion into Venezuela to arrest their president for a criminal prosecution in the United States. Reports from Venezuela indicated that the stunning raid carried out by the U.S. military involved some “magic weapons” which incapacitated and even killed Maduro’ s security. Some of the physical symptoms exhibited by Maduro’s security staff matched those previously discussed by victims of Havana Syndrome, leading to new media focus on the topic.
As a result of the media pressure, the Trump administration quietly admitted the use of such exotic weapons in the Venezuela raid. They recently disclosed to the public that towards the end of the Biden administration, an undercover investigation into Havana Syndrome led to the purchase by the US government of a portable device the government believed, could cause Havana Syndrome symptoms, and that the government has been testing it for a year.
That understandably shocked a lot of people because prior to that, the government had been very dismissive of such weapons, especially the fact portable versions of such weapons were already in circulation in the United States.
Bottom line, it appears that after the directed energy weapons revelations in the Venezuela raid, the Trump administration has been trying to get ahead of the Havana Syndrome debate. The latest tweet by the Department of War is just the latest manifestation of that.
Will the Trump administration finally address the elephant in the room regarding directed energy weapons—the lingering questions about targeting civilians—aka targeted individuals—in the United States who claim they have long been assaulted with such weapons?
One hopes that the transparency the Trump administration has demonstrated thus far regarding this topic will eventually lead to the lingering question surrounding targeted individuals.
An interesting NY Post article recently explored what has become a growing issue of privacy, public safety, and national-security concern: the uneasy intersection between the remarkable benefits of neurotechnology and its potential for misuse. As the piece notes, advances in brain-computer interfaces, neuro-monitoring tools, and cognitive-enhancement research hold enormous promise for medicine and rehabilitation. Yet those same tools, if left unregulated or developed in secrecy, could be exploited by hostile actors in ways that raise troubling ethical and geopolitical questions.
What happens when neurological medicine becomes a weapon?
The New York Post just published a major piece warning that advances in neuroscience could be used to alter human perception, behavior, and consciousness, not in theory, but in practice.
For years, mainstream discussion of neurotechnology focused almost exclusively on its medical potential, while any mention of misuse was often dismissed as fringe speculation. That posture has shifted as prominent neuroscientists and biosecurity experts—most notably Dr. James Giordano, a professor of neurology and bioethics and a long-time advisor to the U.S. military—have publicly outlined the real risks emerging at the intersection of neuroscience and national defense. Dr. Giordano has repeatedly warned that neurotechnology can be “weaponized” not only in the traditional military sense but also through subtler means: tools capable of influencing cognition, degrading decision-making, targeting vulnerable populations, or exploiting neurological data. He emphasizes that while these capabilities are still constrained by scientific limits, several countries are actively researching them, and the U.S. should take that fact seriously. His point is not that science-fiction mind-control devices exist, but that neuro-enabled tools—chemical, biological, digital, or data-driven—can be adapted in ways that create new forms of coercion, surveillance, or tactical disruption.
The NY Post article raises the central policy question of whether Congress is exercising meaningful oversight in this domain. The concern is that many lawmakers are only dimly aware of how far neurotechnology has advanced, and even fewer grasp its defense implications well enough to legislate around it. Those with the deepest knowledge—typically members of intelligence committees—operate under heavy classification restrictions, which discourages open debate and leaves the public largely unaware of how these technologies may be used or misused.
The article’s broader message is that it is time for Congress to engage this issue with urgency and transparency. Neurotechnology is advancing whether policymakers address it or not, and without clear guardrails, the same tools that promise extraordinary medical breakthroughs could also be adapted in ways that threaten civil liberties, public health, and global stability. The call, essentially, is for lawmakers to act before the risks outpace the regulations designed to contain them.
An interesting video is circulating on X (formerly Twitter), featuring a group of targeted individuals (TIs) who showed up to testify at a bioethics commission way back in 2011.
In 2011, during the Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues, many US citizens testified that they were attacked and tortured with Directed Energy Weapons. Their claims were not investigated. #mkultra#coveruphttps://t.co/JVX98e1P9H
I found the video interesting not just because it is a reminder of just how long the mainstream media has buried the TI story, but also because of the calm and composed manner the presenter, one , laid out her case before the panel.
She touched on all the key issues TIs complain about without coming off as melodramatic, or out and out crazy. TIs are usually subjected to injustices that defy logic, so sometimes they struggle to lay out their complaints in a coherent manner. That was not what happened at this panel in 2011, and I must say, I was very impressed by Ms Cassandra Lewis’ testimony before this bioethics panel.
This was her testimony: “Hi I’m Ms Cassandra Lewis, and I’m a targeted individual from Baltimore, MD.” Ms Lewis went on to say that she worked as a legal secretary, and that her targeting was some type of workplace retaliation–something you regularly hear from TIs–retaliation🤔
She went on to say regarding the mode/method of her targeting: “Gang stalking and harassment was used to implement this non- consensual biotechnology application that is being used on me. I now experience involuntary limb movements, I receive stingings, I get pains to my head, to my abdomen, to my vaginal area and to my anal area. I am receiving from a language that I read concerning this technology. It is called Medusa, developed by the Navy, is being used on me.”
Remember, a lot of TIs point to some sort of military industrial complex being behind their torture. Was Ms Lewis an unwitting test subject of also military experiment–probably even for the aforementioned Medusa? Hmm 🤔
She continues: “I get burning on my lower leg and my ankles, I get ringing in my ears that’s pitched, it’s like they pitch it, I get pulses and sensations in my body, I get electrical current, an electrical sensation that goes up and down through my body, and can be isolated to different parts of my body. I get severe tingling on the soles of my feet, it’s almost like being electrocuted, and the first time I experienced this was walking into a bank. I get buzzing sensations on the soles of my feet and individual toes, I also get facial manipulations, just to name a few of the things that have happened to me. I feel as though I’m being robotized, these are very strange occurrences…”
Remember, as outlandish as “roboticization” may have sounded in 2011, we now know that advancements in AI & neurotech now lead some to contemplate a scenario where someone’s brain can be hacked, and their bodily functions manipulated remotely. Was Ms Lewis an unwitting test subject to such cutting edge research, that would typically fall under DARPA—part of the military industrial complex? Hmm 🤔
She closed her remarks by asking all the TIs in the room to stand up, and they did–meaning they came to the panel very organized👍
Long story short, over the last two decades, there has been remarkable advancements in technology, especially as it relates to artificial intelligence and neurotechnology. Every other day new technology contradicts what the mainstream media and the government has repeatedly dismissed as “conspiracy theories”—weather modification, mind reading, directed energy weapons…
It is therefore not a lot to ask that the mainstream media revisit the biggest “conspiracy theory” of them all, and that is, the plight of targeted individuals. What if they have been unwitting test subjects to the dramatic technological advancements we currently enjoy? Doesn’t MSM at least owe that to Ms Cassandra Lewis, who mastered the courage to present her argument before the bioethics panel in 2011?🤷♀️
Woke up uncharacteristically late—around 9:30am. Thursday is usually my work day, so I would be up at 6am sharp, latest 7am. Hmm
I had a PTO day but was planning to go to Brooklyn early this morning right after the kids left for school. My plan was to leave at 8am to go check out this work program I was enrolled in the first time I came to NY. Very good way to stack up some tax free $$
I was forced to leave the program in June 2024 after my kids arrived from Houston, forcing me to move into a family housing facility in Queens. The program is only for residents of the (single men) facility in Brooklyn, BUT BUT BUT, they also have a plan for people who don’t live in a NY housing facility😳
The rule is that you can’t use the program if you are in any other NYC housing facility. Whether that’s the real rule or just a specific one to keep me out, I really don’t know.😂 I’m just telling you what I was told. They said I could come back once I secured housing—got an apartment. I signed the lease the other day, so I figured it would be good to go and put in my application. Not start work there necessarily, but just have an application on file. I’m looking at starting in late September or October if they let me, and only weekends coz I already have another job. Big difference between a program and an actual job🤔
Ended up leaving at about 10am. Stopped by the 179 st station to catch the F train and boom, my Apple Pay is not working at the MTA turnstile.🙄 Remember, I’ve written about this very issue before😳
The itinerary was to catch the F train, get off at Kee Gardens, catch the E to Court street & 23rd, and then ride the G into Brooklyn. The F & E went pretty well until we got to the G train. I was assuming you just had to wait under the G banner for the train like you do with every other stations.
After waiting there for like 30 minutes, I figured I must be in the wrong place. So I started looking around for one of the MTA workers at the booth to ask but nobody at the booth🙄. Usually there would be someone you could ask such questions, or even an NYPD but nobody here—no employee around.
Finally an MTA employee showed up at the booth so I figured I would ask about the G train. I was right, I was in the wrong place. Turns out I had to walk all the way down the platform, then go up the stairs and this and that…literally a maze. I don’t care how long you’ve lived in NYC, but unless you had done this before, there in NO WAY you would have figured this out on the first go. A targeted individual was bound to get lost at this station😂🤷♀️
Anyway, I ended up finding the G train, but in my mind, I had written off the assignment in Brooklyn. Something told me I would be hit with some “you had to be here by 11am” stuff, but I decided to carry on with the mission anyway—I may not fill out the application, but I may lean something new—old school thinking🤔
Surprise surprise, the 11am cut off was real. However they told me that application days are Tuesdays & Thursdays. See, that’s some new information I got. All this time I was thinking you could only do the application on Thursdays.
So I decided to check out another job prospect in Le Bronx. Again, I know it’s too late to do what I intended to do there, but it wouldn’t hurt to go there and set up a later visit. A TI had already “been disrupted”😂 on the Brooklyn mission, so why not check out Le Bronx?🤷♀️
Oh, and btw, on my way back from Brooklyn, actually Brooklyn to Le Bronx, I was stuck again at the turnstile AGAIN. It didn’t accept my Apple Pay. Was I banned by MTA on this clearly “operation day”?😳 Hmm, we report, you decide. I showed the MTA officer that I had money available and they just let me through. Weird, huh? Told you folks, on operation day, a TI will KNOW. You can’t miss it. My guess is still on some neuro chicanery, but that’s just MY guess. I ran that thought by my new best friend ChatGPT😂and guess what came back? Hmm. Notice the last paragraph where it says “abused by state actors on targeted individuals.”😳 I bet you quit rolling your eyes now, didn’t you?😂
I also asked my new best friend ChatGPT😂how this novel neurotech and Zersetung jives with the Geneva Conventions—a valid question that has probably crossed your mind, and here’s what came back. Hmm. Certainly a question for the next Church-type committee🤔
So I caught the C train and got off at Chambers to catch the 2. Got on the 2–long a$$ ride to Le Bronx. People don’t appreciate how far Le Bronx is from Queens & Manhattan. I’d hate to live in Le Bronx and have to commute everyday to Queens or Manhattan. I’m sure a lot of people do—you got to do what you got to do🤷♀️
So I got to my destination in the Bronx and got the information I needed. Every Thursday at 9am. No appointment necessary. Boom, boom, boom, hauled my disrupted a$$ back to Queens. Only this time I made sure to swing by a Deli to withdraw $10 just in case MTA still has me on a “no-ride list”.🙄 You really can’t make this stuff up😂. So I ended up withdrawing some $$, breaking it, and using the cash machine this time🙄.
I have to work on Friday. Wonder if the “ban” would have lifted by then.🙄 Or will it be back to back operation day?😳 We shall see. SAD third world stuff😂
***There’s one other interesting observation I make during ALL “operation days” that I’m not quite comfortable sharing publicly at this time—it may land me into some “racism” problem. But rest assured, it’s quite a constant, that I KNOW it has something to do with the operation—probably even running it.😳 But we’ll save that for later—when it’s no longer controversial to say it, or when some bombshell news report proves it. If you, you KNOW***🤔
***Updated On Thursday 09/11/25***
So I took another PTO on Thursday 09/11/25 to go back to Brooklyn to check on the job prospect I had showed up late for the previous week. I made sure to come in early this time—was there before 10pm, so everything should be fine now, right? WRONG.
They told me I had to come back on 09/23 because their urine-testing machine had broken down—I kid you not. You can’t make this stuff up.😂Something about they had to ship the machine somewhere to get it fixed, so the earliest opportunity to apply would be 09/23. See what TIs go through?🤦♀️ Anyway, I guess it wouldn’t hurt to wait until the 23rd. Now I’m thinking, was I even late the first time around?😂🤷♀️
